Are We Seeing A Chink In The Armor?

A Very Wicked Witch

Washington Post congressional reporter Rachael Bade said, “She was clearly putting a positive spin on what a lot of Democrats have privately said was a failed strategy.”

Source: Washington Post’s Rachael Bade: Privately ‘A Lot of Democrats’ Said Pelosi Impeachment Gambit Was ‘Failed Strategy’

Now Bade is talking about Nancy Pants holding back the articles of impeachment, and it’s significant were starting to see this level talk about moderates questioning Nancy Pants, but when these people wake up and smell the coffee, they’ll come to realize The Impeachment™ is a failed strategy.

The entire rush to have impeachment hearings and a vote in the time and manner in which Nancy Pants and Adam Schitt orchestrated it (Quite possibly with willing help from the left wing news media I might add.), was meant to preempt the release of Michael Horowitz report and his testimony on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.

Top story: TRUMP IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS!

Other stories: Horowitz reports widespread FISA abuse, largely vindicating Devin Nunes

Nancy Pants not sending the article to the Senate, under the same rules by which Bill Clinton was impeached, is a tacit admission by Nancy Pants that the democrats have nothing, and the impeachment would quickly die in the Senate.

Watch the video at the link, and you’ll probably get a real laugh too, when George Stephanopoulos, the left wing Shill that he is, had to rush in there to prop up Nancy Pants.

The fact is, democrats never hid which way they were going to vote when Clinton had his Senate trial, so spare me your crocodile tears about Cocaine Mitch. Ok, Georgie?

You fucking hack.

Over the coming months, as it becomes clearer and clearer what they democrats were up to over the past 5 years, the harder protecting democrats will become for the left wing media… but I suppose Glenn Greenwald will be satisfied.

Stop worrying, the Horowitz Report is perfect!

The report shows all the wrong doing we’ve argued had occurred in fact did occur

The left wing in the media and congress are cherry picking out of the report the phrase, “We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions.”

The left are hanging all their hopes on that, while totally ignoring the rest of the report… as if that sentence makes all else in the report irrelevant, or better somehow.

But, I think John Durham has something to say about that which the left hangs their hopes. He’ll release his report soon.

The funny thing is, the Nunes Report from last year claimed the Carter Page FISA warrant relied primary on the Steele Dossier, among other things.

The left wing media and their sock puppets online all claimed he was wrong and it was a distraction. The insults cast at Nunes were disgusting, frankly.

Horowitz Report: “We determined that the Crossfire Hurricane team’s receipt of Steele’s election reporting on September 19, 2016 played a central and essential role in the FBI’s and Department’s decision to seek the FISA order. ”

Nunes is totally vindicated. He was right. Nunes also asserted that Peter Strzok was the one who decided to use the Steele propaganda.

Horowitz Report: “We determined that the FBI’s decision to rely upon Steele’s election reporting to help establish probable cause that Page was an agent of Russia was a judgment reached initially by the case agents on the Crossfire Hurricane team.”

Peter Strzok was in charge of Crossfire Hurricane.

Again… Nunes is vindicated.

In the end, Horowitz reported, “at least 17 significant errors or omissions in the Carter Page FISA applications, and many additional errors in the Woods Procedures,” which were the 3 FISA warrants granted after the first one on Carter Page.

To this day, not one allegation in the Steele Dossier has been substantiated in even the least bit.

And Comey? That guy really needs to keep his mouth shut, unless he’s planning on being the fall guy for this debacle. Comey took an action at a key point in time that moved forward onto the next stage the left’s plan to remove Trump. That next stage was getting Mueller appointed to lead an independent council.

An independent council has immense investigative powers and is, as the name suggests, independent of direct oversight. An IC can dig into anything or anyone connected to the target, and Mueller’s team cast a very wide net.

Mueller got some people around Trump, that true, but the thing the poor left wing losers can’t get over is he found nothing on Trump.

I’m as surprised as the left. I didn’t vote for Trump in 2016, because Trump sure as hell acts like a shady used car salesman, and I figured he was corrupt somehow. Consequently, I figured Mueller would find something, but when all we saw coming from the IC was the squeezing of Trump associates, and half the people charged were charged for process crimes, I knew Mueller had nothing at all…

It was a fishing expedition and Trump survived it.

Trump is cleaner than I imagined, so I decided to vote for Trump in 2020.

I think the democrats lost many people right there. Those of us who understood the power of an independent council knew if there were anything if Trump was corrupt, Mueller would find it.

The real problem is there’s a cancer in our bureaucracy… Setting political motivations aside, we’ve had people, whether acting individually or in concert with others, engaged in actions that undermined a duly elected President.

Trump is doing what voters elected him to do…

  • NAFTA fixed or scrapped.
  • get tough with China on trade.
  • no more trade agreements, particularly with China.
  • regulatory and tax relief.
  • don’t go into Syria.
  • American immigration laws enforced.
  • better border security… a wall would be nice… with deadly alligators maybe. 😉
  • stop giving foreign aid to corrupt countries!

The point being, the things Trump’s doing aren’t illegal. They’re actions Trump’s voters wanted, but there are elements in the bureaucracy fighting Trump as if his actions are illegal. Sadly, many elements in our media are helping to sell that narrative.

Me thinks they’re invested in an outcome… quite literally invested.

Well, I guess, at this point, mere freedom is a motivator. Bureaucrats fighting Trump have their very freedom at stake. As we well know, Durham has his own investigation, and it’s a criminal investigation. Given Horowitz’ report on the Hillary email server investigation, combined with his report on Crossfire Hurricane, anyone with half a brain should see where Durham’s investigation is headed.

There’s a lot of people sweating, and there’s a lot of left wingers in government and media trying to help them cover it up… sadly.

But I see the incremental destruction of this house of cards, and it does fill me with hope justice will be served.

The Guardian: California: ‘resistance’ state has donated more to Trump than to most Democrats in 2020 race

Residents of California, the self-fashioned “resistance” state that has sued the Trump administration more than 50 times, has donated more money to the Trump 2020 campaign than to most Democratic candidates in the 2020 race.

Donald Trump raised $3.2m in California since the beginning of this year, according to campaign finance data analyzed by CalMatters, a not-for-profit news organization focused on California issues.

Trump beat out everybody in the field except for Senator Kamala Harris, who raised $7.5m, and Mayor Pete Buttigieg, who raised $5.1m. Harris, who is California’s junior senator, has been leading in donations from the state since launching her campaign in January.

Trump bested even the former vice-president Joe Biden, the frontrunner in the Democratic primary, and Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, who have strong support throughout the state.

Source: California: ‘resistance’ state has donated more to Trump than to most Democrats in 2020 race | US news | The Guardian

ABC News: Federal judge dismisses DNC suit against Russia, Trump campaign, Wikileaks

When special counsel Robert Mueller’s 448-page report on Russian interference was released in April 2019 and said that the 22-month investigation did not establish a criminal conspiracy between the campaign and the Russians, attorneys for the defendants renewed their arguments for dismissing the DNC suit. At the time, a source familiar with the DNC’s legal strategy told ABC News they were unbowed by Mueller’s finding and said that the bar for criminality was higher than for civil liability.

On Tuesday, Judge Koeltl ruled against the DNC, emphasizing that they did not allege that anyone other than the Russian government participated in the hacking of their systems, and failed to “raise a factual allegation that suggests that any of the defendants were even aware that the Russian Federation was planning to hack the DNC’s computers until after it had already done so.”

“The DNC argues that the various meetings and conversations between the defendants in this case and with persons connected to the Russian government during the time that Russian GRU agents were stealing the DNC’s information show that the defendants conspired with the Russian Federation to steal and disseminate the DNC’s materials,” Koeltl wrote. “That argument is entirely divorced from the facts actually alleged in the Second Amended complaint.”

Source: Federal judge dismisses DNC suit against Russia, Trump campaign, Wikileaks – ABC News

NTD: Gabbard Hits Harris Over Record as Prosecutor, Harris Spox Says Russia Backs Gabbard

Hey, I’m starting to like this Gabbard lady. I won’t vote for her, but she’s earning my respect with her performance against the insufferable Kamala Harris.

See the video below!

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) hit Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) over the latter’s record as a prosecutor in California during the Democratic debate on July 31.

“I’m deeply concerned about this record [of senator Harris]. … She put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana,” Gabbard said at Detroit’s Fox Theatre.

“She blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so. She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the state of California, and she fought to keep cash bail system in place that impacts poor people in the worst kind of way.”

Harris responded, saying: “I did the work of significantly reforming the criminal justice system of the state of 40 million people which became a national model for the work that needs to be done. And I am proud of that work.”

“And I am proud of making a decision to not just give fancy speeches or be in a legislative body and give speeches on the floor, but actually doing the work of being in the position to use the power that I had to reform a system that is badly in need of reform,” she added.

Gabbard hit back, telling Harris: “When you were in a position to make a difference and an impact in these people’s lives, you did not and worse yet in the case of those who are on death row, innocent people, you actually blocked evidence from being revealed that would have freed them until you were forced to do so.”

Source: Gabbard Hits Harris Over Record as Prosecutor, Harris Spox Says Russia Backs Gabbard