Stop worrying, the Horowitz Report is perfect!

The report shows all the wrong doing we’ve argued had occurred in fact did occur

The left wing in the media and congress are cherry picking out of the report the phrase, “We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions.”

The left are hanging all their hopes on that, while totally ignoring the rest of the report… as if that sentence makes all else in the report irrelevant, or better somehow.

But, I think John Durham has something to say about that which the left hangs their hopes. He’ll release his report soon.

The funny thing is, the Nunes Report from last year claimed the Carter Page FISA warrant relied primary on the Steele Dossier, among other things.

The left wing media and their sock puppets online all claimed he was wrong and it was a distraction. The insults cast at Nunes were disgusting, frankly.

Horowitz Report: “We determined that the Crossfire Hurricane team’s receipt of Steele’s election reporting on September 19, 2016 played a central and essential role in the FBI’s and Department’s decision to seek the FISA order. ”

Nunes is totally vindicated. He was right. Nunes also asserted that Peter Strzok was the one who decided to use the Steele propaganda.

Horowitz Report: “We determined that the FBI’s decision to rely upon Steele’s election reporting to help establish probable cause that Page was an agent of Russia was a judgment reached initially by the case agents on the Crossfire Hurricane team.”

Peter Strzok was in charge of Crossfire Hurricane.

Again… Nunes is vindicated.

In the end, Horowitz reported, “at least 17 significant errors or omissions in the Carter Page FISA applications, and many additional errors in the Woods Procedures,” which were the 3 FISA warrants granted after the first one on Carter Page.

To this day, not one allegation in the Steele Dossier has been substantiated in even the least bit.

And Comey? That guy really needs to keep his mouth shut, unless he’s planning on being the fall guy for this debacle. Comey took an action at a key point in time that moved forward onto the next stage the left’s plan to remove Trump. That next stage was getting Mueller appointed to lead an independent council.

An independent council has immense investigative powers and is, as the name suggests, independent of direct oversight. An IC can dig into anything or anyone connected to the target, and Mueller’s team cast a very wide net.

Mueller got some people around Trump, that true, but the thing the poor left wing losers can’t get over is he found nothing on Trump.

I’m as surprised as the left. I didn’t vote for Trump in 2016, because Trump sure as hell acts like a shady used car salesman, and I figured he was corrupt somehow. Consequently, I figured Mueller would find something, but when all we saw coming from the IC was the squeezing of Trump associates, and half the people charged were charged for process crimes, I knew Mueller had nothing at all…

It was a fishing expedition and Trump survived it.

Trump is cleaner than I imagined, so I decided to vote for Trump in 2020.

I think the democrats lost many people right there. Those of us who understood the power of an independent council knew if there were anything if Trump was corrupt, Mueller would find it.

The real problem is there’s a cancer in our bureaucracy… Setting political motivations aside, we’ve had people, whether acting individually or in concert with others, engaged in actions that undermined a duly elected President.

Trump is doing what voters elected him to do…

  • NAFTA fixed or scrapped.
  • get tough with China on trade.
  • no more trade agreements, particularly with China.
  • regulatory and tax relief.
  • don’t go into Syria.
  • American immigration laws enforced.
  • better border security… a wall would be nice… with deadly alligators maybe. 😉
  • stop giving foreign aid to corrupt countries!

The point being, the things Trump’s doing aren’t illegal. They’re actions Trump’s voters wanted, but there are elements in the bureaucracy fighting Trump as if his actions are illegal. Sadly, many elements in our media are helping to sell that narrative.

Me thinks they’re invested in an outcome… quite literally invested.

Well, I guess, at this point, mere freedom is a motivator. Bureaucrats fighting Trump have their very freedom at stake. As we well know, Durham has his own investigation, and it’s a criminal investigation. Given Horowitz’ report on the Hillary email server investigation, combined with his report on Crossfire Hurricane, anyone with half a brain should see where Durham’s investigation is headed.

There’s a lot of people sweating, and there’s a lot of left wingers in government and media trying to help them cover it up… sadly.

But I see the incremental destruction of this house of cards, and it does fill me with hope justice will be served.

Real Clear Investigations: CrowdStrikeOut: Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims

Barr’s ongoing review, and Mueller’s pending appearance before Congress, offer fresh opportunities to re-examine the affair’s fundamental inconsistencies. Authorized by the president to declassify documents, Barr could shed light on the role that CrowdStrike and other sources played in informing Mueller and the Brennan-directed ICA’s claims of a Russian interference campaign. When he appears before lawmakers, Mueller will likely face questions on other matters: from Democrats, his decision to punt on obstruction; from Republicans, his decision to carry out a prolonged investigation of Trump-Russia collusion despite likely knowing quite early on that there was no such case to make.

If the U.S. government does not have a solid case to make against Russia, then the origins of Russiagate, and its subsequent predominance of U.S. political and media focus, are potentially even more suspect. Given that allegation’s importance, and Mueller’s own uncertainty and inconsistencies, the special counsel and his aides deserve scrutiny for making a “central allegation” that they have yet to substantiate.

Source: CrowdStrikeOut: Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims | RealClearInvestigations

It’s a long read, but well worth your time.

The Hill: Russian oligarch’s story could spell trouble for Team Mueller

The more you peel the onion, the worse this looks for democrats.

Sometimes it is the quiet, elusive ones who come back to haunt you. And for ex-special prosecutor Robert Mueller, one of those might be a Russian billionaire named Oleg Deripaska.

The oligarch who once controlled Russia’s largest aluminum empire has been an international man of intrigue in the now-completed and disproven Trump collusion investigation.

Deripaska was a disaffected former business client of Donald Trump’s fallen campaign chairman Paul Manafort. He also was a legal research client of Trump-hating, Clinton-aiding British spy Christopher Steele. In his spare time, he was an occasional friendly cooperator with the FBI and its fired deputy director, Andrew McCabe.

Source: Russian oligarch’s story could spell trouble for Team Mueller | TheHill

The Epoch Times: Tracing the Origins of Congressional Democrats’ ‘Obstruction’ Strategy

Efforts by members of Congress to advance the narrative that President Donald Trump “obstructed justice” have now replaced the disproven claims of Trump-Russia collusion.

The public narrative of obstruction, however, originated prior to the conclusion of the investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller and his resulting report.

Less than six months after Mueller’s appointment—on Oct. 10, 2017—the Brookings Institution published the first of two reports titled “Presidential Obstruction of Justice: The Case of Donald J. Trump,” which outlined, among other things, a scenario whereby Mueller would refer his obstruction findings to Congress, which would then take up the matter and continue investigating. The report also discussed ways in which Congress could impeach the president, mentioning the word “impeachment” a total of 90 times.

Norman Eisen and Barry Berke, two of the authors of the Brookings report, were later retained by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) on a consulting basis as special oversight counsels to the Democrat majority staff.

As Nadler noted in an announcement, the two men would have a particular focus on reviewing Mueller’s investigation and would be advising the committee. It also appears Nadler intended for the two lawyers to question Attorney General William Barr.

Source: Tracing the Origins of Congressional Democrats’ ‘Obstruction’ Strategy